Legal Opinion

McNutt v. Lovelace

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1933No. 3737Published

1Opinion

On Motion for Rehearing.

WATSON, Chief Justice.

Moving for rehearing, appellant challenges the judgment on the new ground that the tax deed is void because the owner’s right of redemption had not been extinguished when the conveyance was made. Citing Crawford v. Dillard, 26 N. M. 291, 191 P. 513, he contends that the judgment is thus so “inherently defective and erroneous” that this belated attack should be permitted. That the point is properly before us is expressly conceded by appellee.

Counsel agree that the right of redemption in this case is governed by Laws 1913, c. 84, as amended by Laws…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pace v. WightNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Crawford v. DillardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Lewis v. TiptonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
  4. State ex rel. Ols v. RomeroNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Hudson v. PhillipsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API