Legal Opinion · Dissent

Vicki L. Blasing v. Zurich American Ins. Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 2014No. 2012AP000858Published

1DissentPatience Drake Roggensack, J.

¶ 75. (dissenting). I write in dissent because, based on the pleadings and the materials submitted in the summary judgment and declaratory judgment motions, I conclude that the majority opinion erroneously decides that American Family Insurance Company, Vicki Biasing's automobile liability carrier, must assume the defense and indemnification of Menard, Inc. that was initially undertaken by Zurich American Insurance Company, Menard's liability carrier.1 The majority opinion errs because it does not fully address the issue American Family presented: "Does the concept of a permissive user under…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Lawver v. BolingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Hoida, Inc. v. M & I MIDSTATE BANKWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Kerl v. Dennis Rasmussen, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Peters v. Menard, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Lewis v. Physicians Insurance Co. of WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API