Rezek v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOORE, J.
Are statements of witnesses to the crime with which the defendant is charged immune from discovery because the statements were obtained as the result of an internal affairs investigation and placed in an officer’s personnel file? No. A defendant may obtain the statements on a showing of good cause made in a motion brought pursuant to and not precluded under Evidence Code sections 1043 and 1045. We direct the trial court to review the internal affairs report concerning defendant’s complaint in camera and to disclose to defendant the relevant nonprecluded statements of…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Pitchess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. SamayoaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. FuiavaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. Super. Ct. (Johnson)California Supreme Court · 2015
- Jameson v. DestaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Ass'n for L. A. Deputy Sheriffs v. Superior Court of Cal. ex rel. the Cnty. of L. A., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Assn. for L.A. Deputy Sheriffs v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2017
- People v. Foust CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.