Legal Opinion

Demchenko v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 26, 2016No. 2164 C.D. 2015PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY PRESIDENT

JUDGE LEAVITT

’ Peter Demchenko (Claimant) petitions for review of an adjudication of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) denying him compensation benefits for his prostate cancer. Using different reasons, the Board affirmed the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ). It held that Claimant, a retired firefighter, did not prove that prostate cancer is caused by exposure to IARC Group I carcinogens and, thus, an occupational disease under Section 108(r) of the Workers’ Compensation Act. 1 The Board also held that Claimant could not use the statutory…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sherrod v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. City of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Levenson v. SouserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. City of Phila. Fire Dep't v. Workers' Comp. Appeal Bd.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Hutz v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Capaldi v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (City of Philadelphia)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. C. Sessions v. WCAB (City of Philadelphia)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. G. Cantz v. WCAB (City of Philadelphia)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. J. Lee, and his widow, E. Lee v. WCAB (City of Philadelphia)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. L. Campbell v. WCAB (City of Philadelphia)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API