State v. Franks
Court of Appeals of Washington
1DissentBaker, J.
(dissenting) — Dominique Franks has failed to demonstrate that she was actually prejudiced by the State’s poor drafting of the Information by which she was charged with robbery. This minor procedural error should not entitle Franks to any relief whatsoever. Contrary to the majority opinion, we are not required to apply State v. Kjorsvik,3 where a defect in the charging document does not involve the essential elements of the crime.
Franks did not challenge the Information in the trial court. Assuming, arguendo, that the identity of the person charged is an essential element for purposes of the…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Hagner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- State v. KjorsvikWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. LeachWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. JanesWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. HopperWashington Supreme Court · 1992
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.