Legal Opinion
State v. Dumas
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided April 4, 1995No. Nos. 64497, 66333PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KAROHL, Judge.
Defendant, Saadi Dumas, contests a conviction of failure to appear, § 544.665 RSMo 1986. Defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict. He does not appeal a conviction and eight-year sentence for unlawful use of a weapon (COW), § 571.030 RSMo 1986. Defendant was jury-tried on both charges and sentenced by the court as a persistent offender. A Rule 29.15 motion directed at the CCW conviction was denied without an evidentiary hearing.
On February 18, 1991, police officers Anthony Boone and Donald Grace were on routine patrol in the city of St. Louis.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
- State v. CarterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- State v. FitzgeraldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- State v. TwittyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kenneth Lee Baker Steven Robert Baker, Melissa Thomas v. General Motors Corporation, in Re: General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- State v. MillerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. McCoyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- Kenneth Baker v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Kenneth Lee Baker Steven Robert Baker, Melissa Thomas v. General Motors Corporation, in Re: General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000