Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Meredith v. Zavaras

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 23, 1998No. 97SA417PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mullarkey

David Meredith, representing himself pro se, filed this original proceeding seeking a writ of mandamus to compel the respondent, Aristedes Zavaras (Zavaras), Executive Director of the Department of Corrections (the DOC), to comply with two orders of the Denver District Court (the Denver Court). Both orders directed the DOC to credit Meredith for 210 days presentenee confinement. We issued a rule to show cause why Zavaras does not have to comply with the two orders. We now make the rule absolute and order Zavaras and the DOC to credit Meredith for 210 days presentence confinement.

I

On November…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Lujan v. Colorado State Board of EducationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  3. Smith v. MillerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  4. Gramiger v. CrowleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  5. Estep v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Craig v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  2. Rocky Mountain Animal Defense v. Colorado Division of WildlifeColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Fields v. SuthersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  4. People v. McMurreyColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Edwards v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API