State v. Haring
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On error to the Supreme Court. Eor opinion of the Supreme Court, see 25 Vroom 274.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Van Syckel, J.
The question in this case is whether the supplement to the “Act concerning roads,” approved March 12th, 1891 (Pamph. L., p. 137), is constitutional.
Its alleged infirmity is found in its tenth section, which reads as follows: “ That nothing in this act shall be construed to repeal or in any wise affect the act constituting ‘ Essex Public Eoad Board,’ approved March thirty-first, one thousand eight hundred and sixty-nine, or any supplement thereto, or any act amendatory thereof, or relating or applicable thereto, or any act in relation to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. Mayor of ClaytonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1891
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brasko v. DuchekNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1940
- Dixon v. RussellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
- Scarano v. ScaranoNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
- Wyse v. Board of Police CommissionersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1902
- Bowman v. Board of Chosen FreeholdersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1903
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.