Legal Opinion

Gray v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 8, 1921No. 3556PublishedCited by 10 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio; John M. Killits, Judge. Criminal prosecution by the United States against William J. Gray. Judgment of conviction, and defendant brings error.

1Per curiam

Plaintiff in error was convicted on each of five counts of an indictment. By the first (under section 6, title 2, of the National Prohibition Act [Act Cong. Oct. 28, 1919, c. 85, 41 Stat. 305]) he was charged with manufacturing intoxicating liquor without permit therefor; by the second (under section 21, title 2, of that act), with maintaining a common nuisance, viz., a building where intoxicating liquors were manufactured contrary to the National Prohibition Act; by the third (under section 3258, Rev. Stat. [Comp. St. § 5994]), with having in his possession and custody and under his control…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1914
  3. Wechsler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
  4. Ulmer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Singer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1923
  2. Reynolds v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
  3. People v. MehraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. United States v. Eilert Brewing & Beverage Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1921
  5. Norbriga v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API