Legal Opinion
Geilim v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 20, 1991No. B058220PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HINZ, J.—
Introduction
Petitioner Gilbert R. Geilim, attorney at law, for his clients and himself, (Geilim) petitions for writ of mandate/prohibition to restrain and prohibit the superior court from disclosing to the People (unsealing) the items seized pursuant to a search warrant of his law office until after a hearing to determine whether such items or a portion of such items are privileged.
This court denied Geilim’s petition. However, the California Supreme Court granted Geilim’s petition for review and transferred the matter back to this division. Pursuant to the Supreme Court’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. ZolinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- BP Alaska Exploration, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Cooke v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Camp v. Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & MarmaroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Gordon v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Paul L. Gabbert v. David Conn Carol Najera Leslie Zoeller Elliot OppenheimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.