Legal Opinion

Roman v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 26, 2004PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant 849 Manhattan Avenue Realty Associates appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jacobson, J.), dated March 21, 2003, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellant, and the action against the remaining defendants is severed.

Generally, liability for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Hausser v. GiuntaNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Scheer v. RothAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. Salas v. City of YonkersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  5. Martinez v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Farrell v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Sammarco v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Bruno v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. Carter v. 73 Cranberry Street, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  5. Stanchic v. LimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API