Lockwood v. Board of Supervisors of Maricopa County
Arizona Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part · UdallUdall, Justice
I concur in the disposition made hy my brethren of the majority as to the following matters, viz.:(a) Disapproval of the interpretation adopted by the trial court excluding juvenile traffic offenders when computing the number of “persons on probation”. (Par. 6 of judgment, supra.)(b) Reversal of that portion of the judgment attacked by the appellee’s cross-appeal relative to the number of office assistants. (Par. 6, supra.)(c) Affirmance of the lower court’s ruling contained in “Par. 3” of its judgment which upholds the right of the Board to control the purchase, operation and identification…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Prade.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Wise v. First National BankArizona Supreme Court · 1937
- Hicks v. KrigbaumArizona Supreme Court · 1910
- Hunt v. NortonArizona Supreme Court · 1948
- Bank of Lowell v. CoxArizona Supreme Court · 1929
- State v. BorahArizona Supreme Court · 1938
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.