Legal Opinion

Cremer v. Hartmann

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 24, 1885PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the municipal court of St. Paul, reversing a judgment of a justice of the peace.

1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.

The plaintiff in this action recovered a judgment in justice’s court. The defendant appealed to the municipal court, city of St. Paul, where the plaintiff moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the notice of appeal, with proof of service thereof, had not been made and filed with the justice as required by statute. The only proof of service was: “Due service of the within notice is hereby admitted this second day of June, 1884. M. A. Cremer, pr. W. J. C., Agent.” The record, therefore, shows affirmatively that the admission of service was made, not by plaintiff, but *98by some person as…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Graham v. ConradSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  2. Santala v. HillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  3. Treat v. Court Minnesota, No. 17Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API