Santala v. Hill
Supreme Court of Minnesota
From a judgment of the municipal court of the village of Gilbert in favor of plaintiff, defendant appealed to the district court for St. Louis county. The appeal was heard by Freeman, J., who granted plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the appeal. From the order granting plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the appeal, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
Defendant attempted to take an appeal to the district court from, a judgment rendered against him by the municipal eourt of the village of Gilbert. The district eourt dismissed the appeal on the ground that defendant had failed to make personal service of the notice of appeal as required by the statute. Whether this ruling was correct is the only question presented.
The judgment was entered on August 2, 1918. A notice of appeal dated August 2, 1918, and bearing the following indorsement:
“Service of the within notice of appeal by mailing admitted at "Virginia this 2nd day of August,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stolt v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Graham v. ConradSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Cremer v. HartmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Spitzhak v. RegenikSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brennan v. CavanaughSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Thompson v. BergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- City Loan & Finance Co. v. FitchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Thompson v. JohnbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922