Legal Opinion
Speer v. Bordeleau
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided January 15, 1905No. 2434PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Appeal from the District Court of 8an Juan County.
1Opinion of the CourtGunter, J.
Our statutes make the stockholder liable for the debts of the corporation in the amount unpaid upon his stock. — Mills’ Ann. Stats., vol. 1, secs. 486, 497.
*415This action was against the corporation and certain stockholders to- enforce such liability. Proof that the stock was not full paid was essential to its maintenance.
About June 21, 1897, the owners of certain patented lode claims gave bonds and leases thereon, and thereby for a valuable consideration agreed to make and place in escrow a deed therefor; this to be surrendered to the grantees therein on their erecting, by August 21, 1897, a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Handley v. StutzSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Coit v. Gold Amalgamating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Lorillard v. . ClydeNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Nelson v. HubbardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
- Christensen v. . EnoNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brockett v. Winkle Terra Cotta Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
- California Trona Co. v. WilkinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Thoms v. GoodmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1918