Legal Opinion

Holiman v. Hagan's Motors, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided October 10, 1990No. CA 90-44PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

James R. Cooper, Judge.

The appellants purchased an automobile from the appellee, stopped making payments, and returned it. The appellee gave notice of private sale, resold the automobile about eight months later for a price which exceeded the appellant’s indebtedness, and brought an action against the appellants for a deficiency. The trial court entered a deficiency judgment for the appellee in the amount of $3,300.00. From that decision, comes this appeal.

For reversal, the appellants contend that the evidence was insufficient to support the trial court’s finding of a deficiency. We agree,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lipari v. Volume Shoe Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Thrower v. Union Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  3. Cheshire v. Walt Bennett Ford, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990
  4. Colonial Life & Accident Insurance v. WhitleyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Beard v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1993
  2. City National Bank of Fort Smith, Arkansas v. Unique Structures, Inc. Susie ArnallCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  3. Prince v. R & T Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
  4. BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. Unique Freight Systems, Inc.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API