Legal Opinion

United States v. Almohandis

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided February 27, 2004No. CRIM.2004-10004-PBSPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION 1 ON MOTION FOR PRODUCTION OF NOTES OF DEFENDANT’S STATEMENTS (#28)

COLLINGS, United States Magistrate Judge.

Defendant’s Motion for Production of Notes of Defendant’s Statements (#28) raises the issue of whether the defendant is entitled, under Rule 16(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, to production of the rough notes of agents who interviewed him. The defendant has been provided with the agents’ formal reports of the interviews which, presumably, were written after the interviews and based on the rough notes and the agents’ recollections.

The facts are that the defendant,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. Antonios KoskeridesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  3. United States v. Seifullah MuhammadCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  4. United States v. Arleathea Molina-GuevaraCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  5. United States v. KonefalDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. FergusonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2007
  2. United States v. ValleeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API