Legal Opinion
Petko v. Ghoorah
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 26, 1991PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We disagree with plaintiffs’ argument that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence (see generally, *1014Petrovski v Fomes, 125 AD2d 972, 973, Iv denied 69 NY2d 608). The jury was entitled to believe defendant’s testimony that plaintiff wife complained only once of rectal bleeding and defendant’s expert’s testimony that defendant acted in accordance with accepted medical standards in treating her. The court did not err in giving an "error in judgment” charge (PJI 2:150); each party’s expert testified to acceptable methods of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Spadaccini v. DolanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Petrovski v. FornesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
3Cited by6 opinions
- HARDEN, LAURA v. FAULK, M.D., JAMES W.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- BEEBE, MARY v. ST. JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL HEALTH CENTERAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Beebe v. St. Joseph's Hospital Health CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Beebe v. St. Joseph's Hospital Health CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Martin v. Lattimore Road Surgicenter, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.