Legal Opinion

Dunn v. Arbuckle

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 10, 1923No. 24,346PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Reno district court; William G. Fairchild, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

íhe opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

This was an action by E. M. Dunn and five other plaintiffs against the Bankers Mortgage Company and the directors and agents of that company asking that certificates of stock, which had been issued and sold to different plaintiffs at different times by different salesman named as defendants, be canceled and the money paid therefor be recovered with interest. The defendants contend that each of the sales was a separate transaction, and each of the plaintiffs sets forth a separate cause of action in his favor *170against the corporation, its…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bosher v. R. & H. Land Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1892
  2. Jeffers v. ForbesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  3. Benson v. BatteySupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  4. Harrod v. FarrarSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  5. Haskell County Bank v. Bank of Santa FéSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Felten Truck Line, Inc. v. State Board of Tax AppealsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  2. Minch v. WintersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  3. Miller v. Arizona BankArizona Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Gardner v. PereboomSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  5. Holland Oil & Gas Co. v. HollandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API