Legal Opinion

State v. Cannon

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 20, 1988No. 888SC342PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Chief Judge.

Defendants Cannon and Redmond both assign error to the “[t]rial court’s determination before trial and before the sentencing hearing of the sentence to be imposed upon defendants] in the event of a conviction, on the grounds that such determination was grossly improper and violated defendants’ right to due process under the North Carolina Constitution and N.C. Gen. Stat. 15A-1340.3, 1340.4.” The record indicates defendants’ attorneys and the prosecutor had discussed plea bargains, but that the defendants refused to bargain and insisted on pleading not guilty, whereupon…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. State v. PopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. State v. BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  5. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  2. State v. BellamyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  3. State v. MasonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  4. State v. SummerlinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  5. State v. LawsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API