Legal Opinion

City of Seattle v. Barrett

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 6, 1990No. 24025-1-IPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtColeman, C.J.

— The City of Seattle seeks review from the Superior Court's reversal of Currie Barrett's conviction for property destruction in violation of Seattle Municipal Code 12A.08.020, claiming that the Superior Court erred by holding that a municipal ordinance may not contain a different mental element than a similar state law. We reverse.

On October 6, 1987, Currie Barrett entered Gracie's Restaurant and ordered a glass of wine. He was refused service because he was unable to produce proper identification. Barrett then became obnoxious and was asked to leave. He refused to leave and was physically…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. City of Seattle v. EzeWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. WanrowWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  3. City of Bellingham v. SchamperaWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  4. State v. CollinsWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  5. State v. ReidWashington Supreme Court · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Seattle v. WandlerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  2. City of Seattle v. HammonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API