Legal Opinion

City of Seattle v. Wandler

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 22, 1991No. 23100-6-IPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Winsor, J. *

Casper Scott Wandler petitioned for review of his conviction for hit and run of an attended vehicle. The court granted his petition on the following issues: (1) whether Seattle Municipal Code (SMC) 11.56.420 unconstitutionally conflicts with state law; and (2) whether the charging document is constitutionally defective. We affirm.

On February 3, 1987, the City of Seattle (City) charged Wandler with violation of SMC 11.56.420, entitled "Hit and run (attended) — Duty in case of accident with occupied vehicle."* 1 The charging document, which was signed by the arresting officers at…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. City of Seattle v. EzeWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. LeachWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Lenci v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  4. City of Bellingham v. SchamperaWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  5. State v. BaileyWashington Supreme Court · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Auburn v. BrookeWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. City of Seattle v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. City of Seattle v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. DukowitzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API