Legal Opinion
In Re Petition for Clarification
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 6, 2003No. C7-02-1378PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
660 N.W.2d 467 (2003)
In the Matter of a PETITION FOR CLARIFICATION OF AN APPROPRIATE UNIT,
Education Minnesota-Intermediate District No. 917, Local 3904, St. Paul, Minnesota, Relator,
v.
Intermediate School District No. 917, Rosemount, Minnesota, Respondent,
Bureau of Mediation Services, Respondent.
No. C7-02-1378.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
May 6, 2003.
Christina L. Clark, Harley M. Ogata, Education Minnesota, St. Paul, for relator.
Sara J. Ruff, Plymouth, for respondent Intermediate School District No. 917.
Mike Hatch, Attorney General, St. Paul, for respondent Bureau of Mediation Services.
Conside…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Investigation & Determination of an Appropriate Unit & Exclusive Representative Hill-Murray Federation of Teachers, St. Paul v. Hill-Murray High School, MaplewoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- County of Scott v. Public Employment Relations BoardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Independent School District No. 621 v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Anoka-Hennepin Education Ass'n v. Anoka-Hennepin Independent School District No. 11Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In the Matter of a Petition for Clarification of an Appropriate Unit Independent School District No. 622, North St. Paul-Maplewood-Oakdale, North St. Paul, Minnesota v. North St. Paul-Maplewood-Oakdale Education Association, North St. Paul, Minnesota, Relator, Bureau of Mediation ServicesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016