Legal Opinion

E. A. Stephens & Co. v. Albers

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 2, 1927No. 11,726PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Burke

These parties appeared in reverse order in the trial court and we hereinafter refer to them as there.

Plaintiff brought this action in J. P. court for the value of a fox pelt and had judgment for $300.00. Appealed to the county court, and there tried as replevin without a jury, it resulted in a judgment for the return of the property or the payment of its value, i. e., $75.00. Defendant brings error and asks that the writ be made a supersedeas. The parties join in a request for final decision.

We learn from the record that a certain subspecies of fox, having its habitat from central United…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morris v. FrakerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1880
  2. Manning v. MitchersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  3. State v. . HouseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1871
  4. Ulery v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Haywood v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1883

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wiley v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  2. Atkinson v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1948
  3. Kesler v. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Goldberger v. State FarmCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  5. United States v. Gerald L. RichardsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API