Morris v. Fraker
Supreme Court of Colorado
Appeal from County Court of El Paso Coxmty. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.
This was an action instituted by Eraker, the plaintiff below, to recover damages for injuries done to his growing crops of grain and potatoes by the cattle of the appellant.
The trial was by the court, a jury being waived by the parties, and resulted in the finding and judgment for the plaintiff, in the sum of $100.
The defendant, Morris, offered to prove that the fence which inclosed the plaintitffs land was wholly insufficient to turn or*426dinary stock running at large upon the range, and that it was not such a fence as is required by law.
Plaintiff’s counsel objected to the testimony, [rat it…
2Cited by17 opinions
- State v. MoldovanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Robinson v. KerrSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
- State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. OwensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Richards v. SandersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
- Hecht v. HarrisonWyoming Supreme Court · 1895
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.