Legal Opinion

Stebbins v. Patterson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1896PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Kent; Adsit, J. Bill by Andrew J. Stebbins, administrator of the estate of Mary Patterson, deceased, against William Patterson, to recover moneys alleged to have been fraudulently obtained from complainant’s intestate. Prom a decree for complainant, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, C. J.

The bill in this case sets out that Mary Patterson, in her lifetime, was possessed of a certain certificate of deposit issued by the National City Bank of Grand Rapids, dated October 17, 1887; that she held such certificate of deposit in her possession until August 18, 1888, and on that day it was presented at said bank by the defendant, indorsed upon the back with the name of Mary Patterson, by her mark, which mark was witnessed by the defendant and Sylvia C. Patterson, and was duly paid by the bank on that date; and that said moneys are still held by the defendant. The bill further sets…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tompkins v. HollisterMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Shelden v. WeatherwaxMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McNaughton v. Rockford State BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Ramsey v. Child, Hulswit & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917
  3. County of Saginaw v. KentMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Wolkins v. KnightMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Schram v. DederickDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API