Legal Opinion

Schram v. Dederick

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided April 10, 1942No. Nos. 108, 113Published

1Opinion of the Court

LEDERLE, District Judge.

Supplemental Findings of Fact.

9. These supplemental findings and conclusions are being filed upon motion of the defendants in these cases, in accordance with Rule 52(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, no judgments having yet been entered.

10. Following directions appearing in my original findings herein, the parties appeared and introduced evidence as to specific dates and amounts of conceded payments made by the defendants herein to the plaintiff’s predecessor banks.

11. As to defendant Leo A. Dederick, it appears that he made…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Converse v. BlumrichMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Tompkins v. HollisterMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Schram v. BurtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
  4. Dowse v. GaynorMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Allen v. ConklinMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API