Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH v. International Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DYK, Circuit Judge.
ERBE Elektromedizin GmbH and ERBE USA, Inc. (collectively “ERBE”) commenced proceedings before the International Trade Commission (“ITC”) under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 alleging that Canady Technology, LLC and Canady Technology Germany GmbH (collectively “Canady”) engaged in contributory and induced infringement of claims 1, 3, 4, 11, 13, 35, 37, 38, 39, and 41 of U.S. Patent No. 5,720,745 (“'745 Patent”). These claims are drawn to an electrosurgical device and method of coagulating tissue using an endoscope with a plurality of “working channels.” We hold that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- OSRAM GmbH v. International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH & ERBE USA v. Canady Technology LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH & ERBE USA v. Canady Technology LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Suprema, Inc. v. International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Suprema, Inc. v. International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Suprema, Inc. v. International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.