Legal Opinion · Dissent

Suprema, Inc. v. International Trade Commission

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided December 13, 2013No. 19-1564Published

1DissentReyna, Circuit Judge

The majority concludes that the International Trade Commission lacks authority to find a violation of 19 U.S.C. § 1337 (“Section 337”) that is premised on induced infringement where “the acts of underlying direct infringement occur post-importation.” Maj. Op. at 1360. While I agree with the majority’s disposition of this case in all other respects, I cannot join my colleagues’ decision to negate the Commission’s statutory authority to stop induced infringement at the border. Accordingly, I respectfully concur-in-part and dissent-in-part.

I

This appeal arises out of an investigation into alleged…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Buttfield v. StranahanSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Whitfield v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. The Young Engineers, Inc., (Aka Tye or Tye, Inc.,) v. United States International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  4. Akamai Technologies, Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
  5. Kyocera Wireless Corp. v. International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API