Suprema, Inc. v. International Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1DissentReyna, Circuit Judge
The majority concludes that the International Trade Commission lacks authority to find a violation of 19 U.S.C. § 1337 (“Section 337”) that is premised on induced infringement where “the acts of underlying direct infringement occur post-importation.” Maj. Op. at 1360. While I agree with the majority’s disposition of this case in all other respects, I cannot join my colleagues’ decision to negate the Commission’s statutory authority to stop induced infringement at the border. Accordingly, I respectfully concur-in-part and dissent-in-part.
I
This appeal arises out of an investigation into alleged…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Buttfield v. StranahanSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Whitfield v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- The Young Engineers, Inc., (Aka Tye or Tye, Inc.,) v. United States International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Akamai Technologies, Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Kyocera Wireless Corp. v. International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.