Scofield v. Strain
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.
It is the contention of the appellant, in each case that as health commissioner of a city health district under employment by the board of' health he is not a public officer but is an employee and is therefore within the provision of Section 486-19,, General Code, as amended, effective September 4,. 1941, which is as follows: -
“Present employees of city health districts and city-health departments shall continue to hold their positions until removed in accordance with the civil service-laws.”
The primary question presented, therefore, is whether the position of city health commissioner is an…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State, Ex Rel. v. Bd. of Edn.Ohio Supreme Court · 1942
- State Ex Rel. Newman v. SkinnerOhio Supreme Court · 1934
- State Ex Rel. Bricker v. GessnerOhio Supreme Court · 1935
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. FreedlandMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
- State, Ex Rel. Mikus v. HirbeOhio Court of Appeals · 1965
- State Ex Rel. Brand v. EversmanOhio Supreme Court · 1951
- In re Compatibility of County Dog Warden & Village MarshalVan Wert County Court of Common Pleas · 1984
- People of Michigan v. Terence Mitchell BruceMichigan Supreme Court · 2019