Legal Opinion

Scofield v. Strain

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1943No. 29464 and 29467PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

It is the contention of the appellant, in each case that as health commissioner of a city health district under employment by the board of' health he is not a public officer but is an employee and is therefore within the provision of Section 486-19,, General Code, as amended, effective September 4,. 1941, which is as follows: -

“Present employees of city health districts and city-health departments shall continue to hold their positions until removed in accordance with the civil service-laws.”

The primary question presented, therefore, is whether the position of city health commissioner is an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State, Ex Rel. v. Bd. of Edn.Ohio Supreme Court · 1942
  2. State Ex Rel. Newman v. SkinnerOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  3. State Ex Rel. Bricker v. GessnerOhio Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. FreedlandMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
  2. State, Ex Rel. Mikus v. HirbeOhio Court of Appeals · 1965
  3. State Ex Rel. Brand v. EversmanOhio Supreme Court · 1951
  4. In re Compatibility of County Dog Warden & Village MarshalVan Wert County Court of Common Pleas · 1984
  5. People of Michigan v. Terence Mitchell BruceMichigan Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API