Legal Opinion
Eugene Pepper v. Phillip N. Miani and Maduff & Sons, Inc., a Colorado Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 21, 1984No. 82-2357PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOGAN, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Tenth Cir. R. 10(e). This cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying a motion to stay or dismiss all proceedings and to direct the parties to participate in reparations proceedings before the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
Plaintiff, Eugene Pepper, entered into a commodity…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Baltimore Contractors, Inc. v. BodingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Enelow v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Shanferoke Coal & Supply Corp. v. Westchester Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Ettelson v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- H. W. Caldwell & Son, Inc. v. U. S. For Use and Benefit of John H. Moon & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Martha Olson v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Pioneer Properties, Inc. v. Ross Lloyd Martin, the Genesis Marketing Organization LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- Moretrench American Corporation v. S.J. Groves and Sons CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Frutiger v. Hamilton Central School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.