Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. Baum
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the CourtHudgins, J.
J. D. Baum, in an action against Louis and Frank Corleto, recovered judgment in the sum of $4,000 for injuries sustained in an automobile accident. Execution was issued on the judgment and returned marked “no effects.” He thereupon instituted this action for the amount of the judgment and costs, alleging that he was entitled to recover under the omnibus clause of an insurance policy issued by Zurich General Accident and Liability Insurance Company to Louis Corleto. This writ of error brings under review the proceedings in the trial court which resulted in a verdict and judgment against the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Swain v. SeamansSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Lincoln v. FrenchSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Utley v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Moore v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Teal v. BilbySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Reid v. BoyleSupreme Court of Virginia · 2000
- Keepe v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1979
- Benson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1950
- Sauber v. Northland InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Prillaman v. Century Indemnity Co. of Hartford, ConnCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.