Legal Opinion

Riker v. McKneely

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 7, 1980No. 59330PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Chief Judge.

Craig Riker was driving his father’s automobile when it was involved in a collision with a vehicle driven by Mrs. McKneely. Several months later, she brought suit against the Rikers for personal injuries. The Rikers answered contending that she was barred from recovery against them because she was paid the sum of $2,800 in full satisfaction of all claims arising out of the accident and that she and her husband had executed a general release. Shortly thereafter, the Rikers filed a motion for summary judgment which was denied by the trial court because Mrs. McKneely contended…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Morrison v. RobertsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  2. Conklin v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  3. Sapp v. ABC Credit & Investment Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  4. Daniel v. ConradSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Andrews v. SkinnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  2. Stewart v. BoykinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  3. McMullan v. NicholsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  4. Creamer v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  5. Lewis v. SchlenzCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API