Legal Opinion
Vanderwiele v. Steiglehner
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 25, 2004PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Mark M. Meddaugh, J.
The defendant applied to the court for an order vacating the note of issue and removing this action 'from the trial calendar. By stipulation submitted to the court on November 11, 2003, the plaintiff agreed to withdraw the note of issue, and the defendant withdrew its notice of motion to strike the note of issue.
The plaintiff filed an application for an order pursuant to CPLR 3212 seeking partial summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffs pursuant to Labor Law § 240 (1). The defendant cross-moved for an order granting summary ¡judgment to the defendant…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Russin v. Louis N. Picciano & SonNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Nagel v. D & R REALTY CORP.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Shields v. General Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Vernum v. ZilkaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Nephew v. BarcombAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Vanderwiele v. SteiglehnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Vanderwiele v. SteiglehnerNew York Supreme Court, Sullivan County · 2004