Legal Opinion

Khanna v. DOMINION BANK OF N. VA., NA

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 3, 1989No. Record 860588PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCompton, J.

As pertinent to this appeal, Code § 8.01-380(A) provides that a party shall not be allowed to suffer a nonsuit “unless he does so before a motion to strike the evidence has been sustained or before the jury retires from the bar or before the action has been submitted to the court for decision.” The sole issue in this case is whether the trial court erred in denying a motion for nonsuit, ruling that the action had been submitted to the court for decision.

In May 1984, appellee Dominion Bank of Northern Virginia, N.A., filed a motion for judgment in detinue against appellants Harjinderpal Khanna…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wells v. Lorcom House Condominiums' Council of Co-OwnersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989
  2. Moore v. MooreSupreme Court of Virginia · 1978
  3. City of Hopewell v. CogarSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Dalloul v. AgbeySupreme Court of Virginia · 1998
  2. Wells v. Lorcom House Condominiums' Council of Co-OwnersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989
  3. Timms v. RosenblumDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1989
  4. City of Hopewell v. CogarSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989
  5. Liddle v. PhippsSupreme Court of Virginia · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API