Legal Opinion
Palmquist v. SHINSEKI
District Court, D. Maine
Decided August 3, 2010No. Civil 07-98-B-WPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE
JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR., Chief Judge.
Mark S. Palmquist, a former Marine and former employee of the United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), brings this action against the VA alleging unlawful retaliation under the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 791. Mr. Palmquist has filed a Motion in Limine for Judgment on Defendant’s After-Acquired Evidence Defense and Exclusion of Evidence Relating to that Defense. The Court grants Mr. Palmquist’s motion in part; the Government may introduce after-acquired evidence on damages only, not on liability.
I. BACKGROUND
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McKennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Nieves-Villanueva v. Soto-RiveraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Fothergill v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Dennis v. O'Day v. McDonnell Douglas Helicopter Company, a Foreign Corporation, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Second Generation Properties, L.P. v. Town of PelhamCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Miranda v. Deloitte LLPDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2013
- Saba v. Unisys Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Sebunya v. HolderDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2013
- Fine v. Guardian Life Insurance Company of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2022
- US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION v. RICHMONDDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2025