Legal Opinion
Sebunya v. Holder
District Court, D. Maine
Decided July 30, 2013No. 2:12-cv-00067-GZSPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON APPEAL OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION
GEORGE Z. SINGAL, District Judge.
Before the Court are: Defendant’s Appeal of the Magistrate Judge Decision (ECF No. 62) and Motion For Leave To File Second Amended Answer (ECF No. 38). The Court has reviewed the entire record and held oral argument on July 16, 2013. For reasons explained herein, the Court now GRANTS IN PART Defendant’s Appeal and concludes the Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Answer is MOOT.
I. LEGAL STANDARD & PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Because a motion seeking to amend a pleading is generally considered to be a nondispositive…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McKennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Michael Pagano v. Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster General, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Williams v. Ashland Engineering Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Nieves-Villanueva v. Soto-RiveraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Carpenters Local Union No. 26 v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- O'BRIEN v. MAC'S CONVENIENCE STORES LLCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2022
- TUCKER v. LANTMANNEN UNIBAKE USA INCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2022