Legal Opinion

In Re the Probate of the Will of Limberg

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 8, 1938PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Brien, J.

The respondent, William C. Limberg, named as executor in a paper purporting to be the will of his father, Charles A. Limberg, propounded that instrument for probate. The proceeding was contested by Lucille and Gloria Limberg, infant daughters of Alfred Limberg, a deceased son of the testator. The issues of fraud and undue influence were submitted to a jury, which found for the contestants, and upon this verdict the decree of the surrogate denied probate. The Appellate Division, deciding that the proofs were insuf ficient to warrant submission of these issues to the jury, reversed the decree…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of AnnaNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Gick v. . StumpfNew York Court of Appeals · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of LimbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  2. In re the Probate of an Instrument Purporting to be the Will of McCarthyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
  3. In re the Estate of FoderaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. In re the Probate of the Will of PhillipsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1949
  5. In Re the Probate of the Will of QuiglyNew York Court of Appeals · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API