Legal Opinion

Graham v. Patton

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 9, 1973No. 28138PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Grice, Presiding Justice.

The controlling issue in this appeal from the construction of a will is whether or not a residuary legacy was created so as to avoid a partial intestacy.

The case arose when Everett F. Patton, as administrator with will annexed of the estate of Lucile C. Patton, filed a complaint in the Superior Court of Pike County seeking construction of Mrs. Patton’s will. A copy of the will, which was the joint and mutual will of T. B. Patton and Lucile C. Patton, was attached.

Items Five and Six, which are the portions of the will in controversy, provide as follows:

"Item 5. After…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cheney v. SelmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  2. Armstrong Junior College Commission v. LiveseySupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  3. Henderson v. First National Bank of RomeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  4. Davie v. WynnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  5. Tolbert v. BurnsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ray v. HadawayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
  2. Piccione v. ArpSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
  3. Bridges v. TaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
  4. Jim Ray v. Eloise HadawayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
  5. PICCIONE v. ARP, Exr.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API