Legal Opinion
Meutsch v. Travelers Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 19, 1993PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously unanimously modified on the law as modified affirmed with costs to plaintiff in accordance with the following Memorandum: Vehicle and Traffic Law § 313 (1) (a) requires that the notice of cancellation or termination of an automobile policy contain a statement, in a type face not less than 12 point, concerning proof of financial security (see also, 15 NYCRR 34.6 [a]). The insurer, in mailing a notice of cancellation to its insured, must comply strictly with that mandate. An attempted cancellation will be deemed invalid where the notice lacks the required statement or includes…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Barile v. KavanaughNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Government Employees Insurance v. Employers Commercial Union InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Capra v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Olesky v. Travelers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Eveready Insurance v. WilsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gallien v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Meutsch v. Travelers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Gallien v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995