Legal Opinion
Meutsch v. Travelers Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 15, 1994PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Motion for reargument granted and, upon reargument, order*954ing paragraph of order entered April 11, 1994 amended to provide that order appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs and decision filed April 11, 1994 (198 AD2d 845) amended to read as follows:
Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Vehicle and Traffic Law § 313 (1) (a) requires that the notice of cancellation or termination of an automobile policy contain a statement, in a type face not less than 12 point, concerning proof of financial security (see also, 15 NYCRR 34.6 [a]). The insurer, in mailing a notice of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Barile v. KavanaughNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Government Employees Insurance v. Employers Commercial Union InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Capra v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Olesky v. Travelers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Eveready Insurance v. WilsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gallien v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Gallien v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- In re the Arbitration between Allcity InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- In re the Arbitration between General Accident Insurance & Jean-BaptisteNew York Supreme Court · 1996