Legal Opinion

McFarland v. Birdsall

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1860PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from the Fayette Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

The appellants, who were the plaintiffs, brought an action against Birdsall and Thatcher upon a promissory note for the payment of 1,243 dollars. The note bears date March 29, 1856, and was payable to the plaintiffs at six months.

At the commencement of the suit, one Naham H. Burk, as agent of the plaintiffs, and on,their behalf, filed an affidavit alleging that upon said note there is indorsed two credits, viz., April 6, 1857, 500 dollars; Jume 1, 1857, 500 dollars; leaving a balance due thereon of 301 dollars, 86 cents; and that the defendants, Birdsall and Thatcher, *127have sold and conveyed…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Beck v. BurdettNew York Court of Chancery · 1829
  2. Livingston v. BellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1834

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dessar v. FieldIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Goshen Woolen Mills Co. v. City National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Hays v. HostetterIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Harseim v. BoothIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Wooldridge v. IrvingUnited States Circuit Court · 1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API