Legal Opinion

Three "M" Investments, Inc. v. Ahrend Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 10, 1992No. 72077PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMMS, Justice:

Norman Ahrend and The Ahrend Company (TAC), a corporation operated by Ah-rend, defendants below, appeal judgment rendered against them and in favor of Three “M” Investments, Inc. (Three “M”) on the grounds that the trial court erred when it disallowed evidence of a witness’s conviction, prohibited leading questions, refused to give requested jury instructions, and used certain instructions.

The Court of Appeals affirmed finding no error by the trial court in its evidentiary decisions. However, the Court of Appeals refused to address appellants’ jury instruction propositions.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. Frank W. CatheyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  2. United States v. Leslie William HansCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  3. United States v. James Dewey SimsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
  4. United States v. Joseph SperoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  5. United States v. Ronald J. HolmesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  2. Crussel v. KirkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  3. Clark v. Mazda Motor Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  4. Clark v. Mazda Motor Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  5. Three "M" Investments, Inc. v. Ahrend Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API