Legal Opinion

Fonseca v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 18, 2005PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert D. Lippmann, J.), entered September 18, 2003, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion denied and the complaint reinstated.

Flaintiff s testimony at his deposition and at his General Municipal Law •§ 50-h hearing sufficiently established a prima facie case of negligence against defendants. The 81-year-old plaintiff testified that he was injured when the bus he had just boarded “stopped hard,” causing him and other passengers to fall. Flaintiff s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Urquhart v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Harris v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Phillipps v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. DiSalvatore v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. Weston v. CastroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  4. Cohen v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  5. Grant v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API