Legal Opinion · Dissent

Todd Rochow v. Life Ins. Co. of North America

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 5, 2015No. 12-2074Published

1DissentStranch, Circuit Judge

The issue before us arises under a remedial statute, fashioned on the precepts of equity, which empowers a plan participant to bring a civil action to “recover benefits due” and “to obtain other appropriate equitable relief.” 29 U.S.C. §§ 1132(a)(1)(B) & (a)(3). In the parlance of ERISA and equity jurisprudence, the remedy is to “make whole” the injured. Here, Rochow — a company president whose mental capacity was destroyed over time by a brain infection — sought disability benefits from LINA starting in 2002. Over five years later, in October 2007, he received his first benefit payment (a…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API