Legal Opinion

Payne v. Ellwood

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 17, 1914PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHuff, C. J.

The plaintiffs in error, Kate S. Payne and J. F. Sageser, brought separate suits against defendant in error, W. L. Ell-wood; the two cases were thereafter consolidated in the court below by agreement, and the case as repleaded was in the nature of trespass to try title; the action resolving itself into one of boundary, Kate S. Payne showing title to section 9, block D — 10, and J. S. Sageser to section 10, block D — 10, E. L. & R. R. Ry. Co. The defendant owns sections 58 and 59, block 1, R. M. Thompson surveys, which lie west of the two sections owned by plaintiff. The controversy is over a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ablowich v. Greenville Natl. Bank.Texas Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Silliman v. GanoTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Burleson v. BurlesonTexas Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Moore v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. StrycharskiTexas Supreme Court · 1896

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Prescott-Phœnix Oil & Gas Co. v. Gilliland Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Thomas v. Southwestern Settlement & Development Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  3. Allen v. DraperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  4. Slaughter v. HightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. Dugger v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API