Legal Opinion

Bodenstein v. Singer

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1925Published

1Opinion of the Court

McGoldrick, J.:

The defendants Saul Singer, Jacob Reich and Garment Center Realty Company, Inc., move under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice for judgment dismissing the complaint upon the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The complaint alleges that on or about December 11, 1919, I. Bodenstein, Inc., subscribed for $50,000 par value of the stock of such defendant, and that in or about the month of April, 1921, entered into a written lease with it for the twenty-first floor of premises owned by the latter, and known as No. 498 Seventh avenue,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Upton v. TribilcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Van Slochem v. . VillardNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Bernhan Chemical & Metal Corp. v. Ship-A-Hoy, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  4. Rozen v. Dry-Dock, East Broadway & Battery RailroadNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1894
  5. Leszynsky v. RossNew York Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API