Legal Opinion

Leszynsky v. Ross

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1901PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Demubbeb to complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.

The demurrer to the complaint, if well founded, may save the need of a trial upon the facts as the strength of the plaintiff’s case is carefully stated, and the pleadings free from criticism save as the facts stated may fall short of affording relief.

The controversy is between two persons engaged in the floating "of mining properties. They made two agreements, somewhat involved in their character, the one dated May 15, 1899, and the other September 13, 1899. The plaintiff seeks to rescind the latter agreement, on the ground of fraud of the defendant by which plaintiff was induced to assign…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Booth v. DodgeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bodenstein v. SingerNew York Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API