Legal Opinion

Karam v. Law Offices of Ralph J Kliber

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 9, 2003No. Docket 225505PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarkey, J.

In this legal malpractice action, plaintiffs appeal by right the trial court’s order granting summary disposition in favor of defendants. We affirm.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Plaintiffs Carole Karam and David Karam sued defendants Kliber and nbd for providing allegedly erroneous legal and tax advice concerning an estate plan for the decedent, Abraham Karam, Jr., that plaintiffs claim resulted in a large federal estate tax liability upon the decedent’s death. The estate plan consisted of a last will and testament and a revocable trust (including amendments) with the decedent as the settlor…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Heyer v. FlaigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Simko v. BlakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Harts v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Beaty v. Hertzberg & Golden, PcMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Candelaria v. B C General Contractors, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Calvert v. ScharfWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Carole M. Karam v. Sagemark Consulting, Inc., F/k/a Cigna Financial Advisors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  3. Papazian v. Goldberg (In Re Mardigian Estate)Michigan Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Sorkowitz v. Lakritz, Wissbrun & Associates, PCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. In re: Brian Scott Driesenga and Lori Ann DriesengaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API