(PC) Cassells v. Villa
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KEITH M. CASSELLS, No. 2:18-cv-2457 JAM DB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 NADINE N. VILLA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that his rights have been violated because he has not been found 19 suitable for parole. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s amended complaint for screening. 20 (ECF No. 12.) For the reasons set forth below, the court will recommend…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Harry Franklin v. Ms. Murphy and Hoyt CuppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.